🔗 Share this article

An unexpected contact on the professional network. An offer of employment from a recruiter, probably a female agent, based in China. The opportunity to make perhaps £20,000 on the side preparing a small number of geopolitical reports for a Chinese company peppered with “non-public” or “insider” insights. Compensation in cryptocurrency or physical money preferred.

It might appear obvious, on this telling, that something about this approach would be suspicious. However, China’s powerful intelligence agency continues to view it worthwhile to use recruitment consultants to try it – prompting MI5 to issue multiple warnings about their activity on the internet.

Large-Scale Approaches on Professional Networks

Last year, MI5 chief the agency's director said Chinese agents were contacting Britons on LinkedIn on an extraordinary level, at a rate of ten thousand over the previous two and a half years, attempting to obtain political, industrial, defense and technological secrets. However a fresh initiative aimed at elected officials and Westminster has prompted the spy agency to take further action.

An espionage alert was issued on this week via the offices of the Commons speaker and his House of Lords counterpart: a brief presentation after the persistent attempts of Shirly Shen and Amanda Qiu to contact MPs, lords, their staffers, economists, research organizations – anyone who might become a source.

Security Strategy and Legal Changes

In the curious manner of UK security services, there was no publication of the security advice from the agency or the interior ministry. But the agency was aware its advisory document would become public once it was emailed out to parliament. Sharing it in the press assists the wider public more easily recognize communications with a fraudulent purpose.

The alert has the effect of uncovering additional details from in and around Westminster, although that is not the agency's primary purpose. The agency wants public figures to recognize that just because interactions on professional networks are not as toxic as on other social platforms, it doesn't imply they are without risk.

Nor is domestic spy agency understood to have been responding to any specific incident in parliament, though the recent actions occur after the embarrassing collapse of the prosecution of a ex-assistant Christopher Cash and his associate another person on a legal detail earlier in the autumn.

The two had been charged of working for the foreign power – a allegation they rejected – but failure to complete a trial under the now repealed Official Secrets Act led to warnings that British democracy had been insufficiently defended.

Revised Laws and Beijing's Long-Term Goals

The law has since been updated, and the MI5 slide includes a note of its replacement: “Those engaging in spying operations face substantial criminal penalties under the National Security Act.” It is a criminal offense if a person participates in conduct that could potentially “significantly help a foreign intelligence service”.

An obvious question, though, is what China has to achieve. An elected representative who is outside ministerial roles will have limited knowledge of classified material, and an associate of theirs even less. Yet Beijing is also interested in the legislative body: for a period, in 2020 and 2021, the Britain's China policy on matters such as Huawei or the Uyghur repression or alleged atrocities was being influenced by parliamentarians.

Cultural Differences and Ongoing Cyber Risks

In part there are cultural differences as well. Authoritarian governments like Beijing's export intelligence collection methods and the scale of its spy network is enormous, employing three hundred thousand people. A former US official, a American cybersecurity head under the US administration, commented it was occasionally assessed that “China have more English speakers involved in this than Western agencies have personnel with language skills”.

Beijing is prepared to cultivate people over the extended period and sometimes even the agencies have found it difficult to distinguish between legitimate relationships and espionage. “Beijing has a low threshold for what information is deemed to be of value,” the minister responsible a government official informed parliamentarians on Wednesday, but a sudden turn in the political cycle may mean an individual rapidly peripheral turning important.

Another way to think about the relentless activities at covert intelligence collection is in the broader framework of the geopolitical contest between Beijing and the Western nations at a threshold below the point of outright war. China has stepped up its cyber operations, with the one campaign infiltration of phone and data networks in numerous nations, and the Volt Typhoon breach of millions connected equipment.

Beijing is engaged in persistent efforts to find secret informants on UK politics via digital means because it wants to be challenging, to demonstrate power and because it has the capability.